Axiomatic Equilibrium Selection
نویسندگان
چکیده
We apply three axioms adapted from decision theory to refinements of the Nash equilibria of games with perfect recall that select connected closed subsets called solutions. Undominated Strategies : No player uses a weakly dominated strategy in an equilibrium in a solution. Backward Induction: Each solution contains a quasi-perfect equilibrium and thus a sequential equilibrium in strategies that provide conditionally admissible optimal continuations from information sets. Small Worlds: A refinement is immune to embedding a game in a larger game with additional players provided the original players’ strategies and payoffs are preserved, i.e. solutions of a game are the same as those induced by the solutions of any larger game in which it is embedded. For games with two players and generic payoffs, we prove that these axioms characterize each solution as an essential component of equilibria in undominated strategies, and thus a stable set as defined by Mertens (1989). Date: 23 April 2009.
منابع مشابه
Axiomatic Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Signaling Games with Generic Payoffs
Three axioms from decision theory select sets of Nash equilibria of signaling games in extensive form with generic payoffs. The axioms require undominated strategies (admissibility), inclusion of a sequential equilibrium (backward induction), and dependence only on the game’s normal form even when embedded in a larger game with redundant strategies or irrelevant players (small worlds). The axio...
متن کاملSecond Order Stochastic Dominance , Reward - Risk Portfolio Selection and the CAPM
Starting from the reward-risk model for portfolio selection introduced in De Giorgi (2004), we derive the reward-risk Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) analogously to the classical mean-variance CAPM. The reward-risk portfolio selection arises from an axiomatic definition of reward and risk measures based on few basic principles, including consistency with second order stochastic dominance. Wi...
متن کاملNon-Equilibrium Thermodynamics: An Alternate Evolutionary Hypothesis
An alternate evolutionary hypothesis is discussed: non-equilibrium thermodynamics. It is argued that evolution is an axiomatic consequence of organismic information obeying the second law of thermodynamics and is only secondarily connected to natural selection. As entropy increases, the information within a biological system becomes more complex or variable. This informational complexity is sha...
متن کاملAn Axiomatic Approach of Repeated Interactions
This paper proposes an axiomatic approach to study repeated interaction problems. A solution is a correspondence that maps the set of stage games into the set of infinite sequences of action profiles. Several axioms are presented for a solution: individual rationality, (strong, constrained or weak) collective intelligence, and internal stability. We classify all stage games into families, based...
متن کاملLinking Behavioral Economics , Axiomatic Decision Theory and General Equilibrium Theory
Linking Behavioral Economics, Axiomatic Decision Theory and General Equilibrium Theory
متن کاملPartially-specified probabilities: decisions and games
The paper develops a theory of decision making based on partially-specified probabilities. It takes an axiomatic approach using Anscombe-Aumann’s setting, and is based on the concave integral for capacities. This theory is then expanded to interactive models in order to extend Nash equilibrium by introducing the concept of partially-specified equilibrium.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009